Red State Governor Shoots Down Bill Banning This Common Hospitality Industry Item

Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte vetoed authorities that would mostly prohibition Styrofoam containers, dubbing it "textbook authorities overreach."

House Bill 477 would shape retired nan usage of nan containers by 2030, but starting successful 2028 for restaurants and nan hospitality industry. Introduced by Democrat authorities Rep. Marilyn Marler, nan authorities garnered immoderate bipartisan support successful nan Republican-majority legislature.

WATCH: RED STATE GOV URGES FIREARMS MAKERS TO DITCH COLORADO AMID ITS ANTI-GUN PUSH

A Styrofoam cup (Julie Schwietert Collazo/File)

"Our authorities should stay a sanctuary for state and free enterprise, and fto precocious taxes, precocious spending, and hyper-regulation stay a characteristic of heavy blue, progressive states," nan Republican wrote successful his veto letter, citing really various bluish states for illustration California and Washington person imposed akin regulations.

"Frankly, I was amazed to person House Bill 477 which dictates to restaurants, nutrient establishments, bakeries, resorts, hotels, and others what they tin and can't usage to package nutrient and drinks," he continued.

Proponents of nan authorities based on that nan worldly poses a wellness and biology risk, and galore places person already stopped utilizing Styrofoam, according to KTVQ. 

CUTTING THE 'GREEN TAPE': CONSERVATION GROUP OFFERS TOP 10 WAYS FOR DEPT OF INTERIOR TO STREAMLINE

Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte (William Campbell/Getty Images/File)

The bill stated that polystyrene foam "is a worldly that causes biology harm and poses a threat to food and wildlife; and whereas, styrofoam takes up abstraction successful landfills and contributes to nan request for costly description s borne by taxpayers; and whereas, styrofoam threatens nan correct of each Montanan to a cleanable and healthful environment."

The connection included a fewer exceptions but would require an exertion for utilizing nan foam arsenic it relates to "transportation; construction; health; aliases safety."

"Finally, if policymakers are trying to get free of Styrofoam, which I'm not, why only target restaurants and food-service establishments? Why not packaging supplies? Though I'm not advocating specified an approach, targeting 1 manufacture that uses Styrofoam and not different seems inconsistent pinch nan purported intent of House Bill 477," nan politician wrote.

GOP GOVERNOR RALLIES AROUND HISTORIC PROPOSAL TO SLASH STATE'S INCOME TAX: 'I AM OPTIMISTIC'

"The authorities banning Styrofoam is costly authorities overreach," Gianforte said, saying it would costs taxpayers an estimated $300,000 done a caller Montana Department of Environmental Quality programme and could create further costs for consumers if businesses are forced to make nan switch.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"I bask basking java successful a Styrofoam cup because it keeps it hot. And this measure is simply a basking mess," he said successful a video posted to X connected Monday.