Newt Gingrich: The Only Solution To The Crisis Of Radical District Judges

The conflict complete whether unelected national territory tribunal judges should beryllium capable to unilaterally halt an elected president of nan United States’ schedule has reached a captious point.

For nan past 3 months, nan American people’s effort to profoundly alteration nan Washington constitution has been blocked by extremist territory judges, who person wildly exceeded their authority. In nan first 100 days of President Donald Trump’s 2nd administration, little tribunal judges person issued 37 nationwide injunctions against various management actions. That is much than 1 each 3 days.

This is not an rumor of judges against President Trump. It is an rumor of judges against nan American people.

NUMBER OF INJUNCTIONS HALTING TRUMP POLICIES TROUNCES PREDECESSORS BY DOUBLE

In nan 2024 election, nan American group elected a Republican House, Senate, and President. President Trump carried each 7 plaything states. He received 77.3 cardinal votes – 2.3 cardinal much than Vice President Kamala Harris.

We must protect nan American people’s correct to elite those who negociate nan national government.

There are 677 territory judges connected nan national bench. If immoderate of them tin rumor nationwide injunctions to override nan decisions of nan elected president, we are successful a existent crisis. Remember, these judges person ne'er been elected by nan American people. They look nary consequence if their rulings consequence successful ruined lives aliases wasted payer dollars.

Not each of them are overreaching, but immoderate surely are. And immoderate of nan nationwide injunctions which person been passed verge connected insanity. 

One injunction asserted that nan executive cannot region aliases terminate fugitive admissions into nan United States and had to  accept hundreds of thousands of refugees – ne'er mind nan humanitarian aliases financial costs of nan decision.

SPEAKER JOHNSON GIVES VERDICT ON HOUSE PLAN TO IMPEACH JUDGES BLOCKING TRUMP

Another injunction blocked nan removal of men from women’s prisons contempt nan consequence of beingness harm to female prisoners. 

A 3rd injunction blocked nan executive branch from doing thing astir alleged sanctuary cities. It went wildly overboard and asserted nan White House cannot moreover person conversations astir sanctuary cities. 

These are conscionable a fewer examples of nan absurd judicial micro-management we are witnessing.

SENATOR WARNS OF 'UNCONSTITUTIONAL' JUDICIAL OVERREACH AHEAD OF SCOTUS SHOWDOWN

When President Thomas Jefferson was moving to build and protect our caller nation, he warned that authorities yet controlled by judges would beryllium a roadworthy to despotism. In a letter to William Jarvis connected Sept. 28, 1820, Jefferson wrote: 

"You look ... to see nan judges arsenic nan eventual arbiters of each law questions: a very vulnerable doctrine indee[d] and 1 which would spot america nether nan despotism of an Oligarchy."

As I testified astatine a House Judiciary Subcommittee hearing, nan Founding Fathers each believed that nan 3 branches of authorities should beryllium co-equal. If anything, nan judiciary would beryllium nan weakest of nan 3 branches. They were clear that nan 2 elected branches could correct nan judicial branch if it tried to enforce its will connected nan American people.

Alexander Hamilton warned successful nan Federalist Papers that nan legislative and executive branches could powerfully respond to judges – and judges would person nary intends of defending themselves.

As president, Jefferson and nan Democrats eliminated 14 of 34 national judges successful nan Judiciary Act of 1802. They did not impeach anyone (a lengthy and difficult task). Jefferson simply abolished nan judgeships and nan judges nary longer had jobs.

We do not person to destruct territory courts successful nan Jeffersonian contented – unless we are forced to.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Hopefully, nan U.S. Supreme Court will admit that judicial tyranny by little courts is intolerable and unsustainable. The High Court could return decisive steps to destruct nationwide injunctions by section judges – aliases make a norm that they are instantly adjudicated by nan Supreme Court.

In nan meantime, nan House and Senate person begun activity to correct absurd overreach by nan astir extremist territory tribunal judges.

This week’s preamble of nan Judicial Relief Clarification Act of 2025 by Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley and 20 senators is simply a powerful awesome that nan Senate tin take sides itself against tyrannical judges. When this is mixed pinch Congressman Darrell Issa’s No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025 (which passed successful nan House by 219-213) it’s clear nan territory judges are forcing a law crisis.

We must protect nan American people’s correct to elite those who negociate nan national government. Lower tribunal judges who deliberation they tin micromanage and override nan elected president and Congress person a elemental path: Resign and tally for office.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Hopefully, nan Supreme Court will extremity this absurdity. If not, nan Congress and nan president will person to workout their law authority and destruct nationwide injunctions by territory judges.

There is nary replacement if we are to clasp authorities of, by, and for nan people.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM NEWT GINGRICH