Lawyer Of Whistleblower In Trump Impeachment Case Sues Administration Over Revoked Security Clearance

A lawyer who represented a authorities whistleblower successful a lawsuit that led to President Donald Trump's first impeachment sued nan Trump management connected Monday for "unconstitutional retaliation" aft his information clearance was revoked.

Lawyer Mark Zaid based on that nan administration's determination to propulsion his clearance successful March was successful retaliation for representing erstwhile Department of Homeland Security intelligence main Brian Murphy, who was cardinal to Trump's 2019 impeachment.

Murphy revenge a whistleblower title successful 2019 alleging Trump, amid his re-election campaign, pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to analyse then-U.S. statesmanlike campaigner Joe Biden and his boy Hunter's business dealings successful Ukraine. 

The U.S. House of Representatives voted later that twelvemonth to impeach Trump for abusing nan powerfulness of his agency and obstructing Congress, but he was later acquitted by nan Senate.

HAKEEM JEFFRIES BLAMES TRUMP FOR NEWARK AIRPORT CHAOS, ACCUSES WHITE HOUSE OF 'BREAKING THE FAA'

A lawyer who represented a whistleblower who was cardinal to President Donald Trump's first impeachment sued nan management for pulling his information clearance. (Reuters/Leah Millis)

Zaid's lawsuit, revenge successful national tribunal successful Washington, D.C., claims nan determination to rescind his information clearance represents a "dangerous, unconstitutional retaliation by nan President of nan United States against his perceived governmental enemies" that "eschews immoderate semblance of owed process."

The title accuses nan Trump management of violating nan Administrative Procedures Act, nan First Amendment and parts of nan Fifth Amendment.

"No American should suffer their livelihood, aliases beryllium blocked arsenic a lawyer from representing clients, because a president carries a grudge toward them aliases who they represent,"  Zaid said successful a statement. "This isn’t conscionable astir me. It’s astir utilizing information clearances arsenic governmental weapons."

Lawyer Mark Zaid based on that nan administration's determination to revoke his clearance successful March was successful retaliation for representing erstwhile Department of Homeland Security intelligence main Brian Murphy. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

FORMER VP PENCE VOWS TO SPEAK OUT IF PRESIDENT TRUMP VEERS FROM 'CONSERVATIVE AGENDA' 

The suit cites a 2019 incident successful which Trump called Zaid a "sleazeball" astatine a Louisiana rally and told reporters that nan lawyer was a "disgrace" who "should beryllium sued."

The move to propulsion Zaid's clearance was "a bald-faced onslaught connected a ineffable law guarantee: nan correct to petition nan tribunal aliases national agencies connected behalf of clients," nan suit says, noting that an "attack connected this correct is particularly insidious because it jeopardizes Mr. Zaid’s expertise to prosecute and correspond nan authorities of others without fearfulness of retribution."

Trump has besides revoked clearances of respective different political foes, including erstwhile President Joe Biden, erstwhile Vice President Kamala Harris, erstwhile Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and his ain erstwhile nationalist information advisor John Bolton, arsenic good arsenic attorneys astatine different rule firms.

The suit accuses nan Trump management of violating nan Administrative Procedures Act, nan First Amendment and parts of nan Fifth Amendment. (Pool via AP)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Zaid urged nan court to norm that Trump's revocation determination was unconstitutional and reinstate his clearance. He has had entree to classified accusation since 1995 and a information clearance since 2002.

Fox News Digital has reached retired to nan White House for comment.

Reuters contributed to this report.