How To Teach A Controversial Novel Of Racial And Sexual Violence In 2025

Long aft it had gone retired of print, Lois-Ann Yamanaka’s Blu’s Hanging retained its spot of grant arsenic nan past reference connected my Introduction to Asian American Literature syllabus. I scrounged connected for years pinch scant copies, school nan matter some for its arguable interethnic representational authorities and its harrowing plait of intersexual exploitation pinch economical vulnerability, of wounded pinch hunger.

Article continues aft advertisement

Then, 2 female students came up to nan podium aft a first day’s lecture. They asked, pinch upset and indignation, why I had not fixed trigger warnings. This was erstwhile specified warnings were first making their measurement into nan schoolroom and it occurred to me, not gladly, that if these became manufacture standard, each my courses would request them.

In taste and feminist studies, knowing unit successful its various forms and effects is halfway to nan assignment. That is, confronting nan very societal ugliness mostly considered triggering is our content. My students’ affront felt arsenic sensible to maine arsenic expecting anatomy classes to emblem each splay of flesh. It is each splay of flesh. That is what we do here. You do your world nary favors, I wanted to opportunity to these young women of color, in taking objection to this arsenic curriculum. Teaching societal critique, it seemed, would now mean asking students to stock nan ethical work to face pain, while handing retired discharge slips.

Not agelong aft this complaint, I took Blu’s Hanging disconnected nan syllabus. Though I had published instruction plans extolling nan rewards of this text, arsenic adjacent parts entity instruction and puzzle box, I deserted them successful a operation of pique and fatigue. I would thatch this book successful each its howling difficulty, aliases I would not thatch it astatine all.

Over nan people of 3 days, my bid of lectures had required america to: 1) analyse nan settler-colonial history of Hawai’i; 2) unpack nan unit successful nan communicative specified that, though graphic, it not beryllium mistaken for gratuitous; and 3) participate into nan nationalist contention that erupted astir a Fiction Award, 1 that a niche world relation bestowed upon Yamanaka, and instantly rescinded. Mind you, nan rank of nan Association for Asian American Studies (AAAS) is possibly a 1000 higher-ed module and postgraduate students from crossed nan humanities and societal sciences. (By comparison, nan superior world relation successful nan United States for scholars of connection and lit unsocial has a roster of complete 20,000.)

Yet, successful 1998, erstwhile a sheet of lit scholars chose this caller for nan AAAS book grant and a contingent of nan rank protested it, nan tempest from this teapot spilled onto sentiment pages specified arsenic The Atlantic and nan New York Times. That nan internecine conflict went nationalist was regrettable: spectators crowed for these title and gender studies nerds to spell astatine each other, pinch nan book taking arguably nan top damage. Yet, that contention besides begot Blu’s Hanging, arsenic inextricably arsenic nan chicken, nan egg.

Yamanaka’s penning had met pinch acclaim and ire from nan start. Her very first book, Saturday Night astatine nan Pahala Theatre, received nan Pushcart Prize, nan Elliot Cades Award for Literature . . . and nan 1994 poesy grant from nan AAAS. That is, her activity struck consternation because nan Association for Asian American Studies would travel to grant it repeatedly—despite nan Filipino men who loomed arsenic bogeys/sexual predators successful nan Japanese Hawaiian imaginary she evoked.

Faced pinch mounting charges of bigotry from wrong her readership, she could person opted to coming a cautiously shrink-wrapped story, pinch each nan virtues and vices intelligibly labelled, to beryllium she was taking notes. That, instead, she tripped nan aforesaid ligament of anti-Filipino stereotypes 3 books successful a row? This seemed to maine to stem not from carelessness aliases spite but obstinacy. Rather than surrender that risky content, she chose, successful Blu’s Hanging, to constitute it harder. What do nan predators successful this world person successful common, and who are its astir susceptible victims? Look again, she insisted, and fig it out.

I judge I understand thing of this intransigence. Sure, each my syllabi now travel emblazoned pinch “content warning,” successful reddish artifact letters. All it took was a world pandemic. What it took was COVID-19’s measurement of rendering meaningless each precedent, of schooling america alternatively astir capacity. In nan spot of expectation, we learned really precarious it was (is) that classes meet astatine all, really bonzer that we publication things and talk them while successful crisis. Under these conditions I recovered that students were not averse, actually, to grueling people content, but that, much than ever, if assemblage were going to return up our clip and energies, what we did location should heed nan discourse and stakes for their lives.

Studying group and intersexual violence, suicidality and depression, self-harm and survival: thing was beyond my students but they could usage a little objective pace, a much quality scale. And this was not excessively overmuch to ask. The pandemic taught maine that nan people I felt my students needed was successful truth nan aforesaid 1 wherever they knew that their feelings and wellbeing mattered. Without these conditions? I mightiness ne'er person figured retired that issuing a awesome for caution, an invitation to intention, request not mean nan surrender of pedagogical rigor aliases world freedom. I mightiness not person travel astir to nan beforehand announcement arsenic a mini capable concession for continuing to face difficult things together.

Those lessons make school Blu’s Hanging feel erstwhile again warranted, this caller that makes thing easy. It sits america beside nan Ogatas, siblings whose each assurance we perceive but whom we are helpless to protect. “Love’s king-size breadstuff useful nan best, white, for Maisie, Blu, and me.” Ivah’s voice, from connection one, for illustration mainlining vulnerability—only, patterned for illustration a poet’s dream. Crucial messages embedded wherever our unreliable narrator conscionable glimpses them, struggling against herself to see.

Through it all, Blu: surely arsenic beloved arsenic flawed characters come, his maltreatment nan much unbearable for it. “Dear Ivah,” he writes, and from that missive connected we spot and consciousness seen by him. It begins, “Merry Christmas and Happy Birthday. You mightiness deliberation I bought you nan worst coming ever successful nan full wide world. But I really had deliberation astir it for agelong time.” It ends, “So present my Christmas coming (Kotex) and day coming (Modess) to you. Only had 2 kinds truthful wasn’t that hard. And I will bargain for you again if you want maine to.” The gift is besides nan missive itself—addressed to Ivah but meant for us—in nan people of which a wounded gets healed which is someway not hers alone. This is simply a caller unsparing successful its emotion for america done Blu and Ivah and Maisie, moreover though, arsenic Ivah recalls, “we ne'er opportunity it successful this family.” Yamanaka strove to show rather than tell her detractors her noble intentions, and successful truthful doing fell connected her ain stubborn sword, but still I judge her. “We conscionable ne'er opportunity it successful this family.”

With Kaya’s reissue, it will person been astir 30 years since Blu’s Hanging’s original publication. The novel’s disappearing from shelves nether a unreality and past its reemergence for a caller procreation echoes nan very root communicative of Asian American literate history. Books specified arsenic Carlos Bulosan’s America is successful nan Heart and John Okada’s No-No Boy—the erstwhile released to mainstream acclaim successful nan 1940s, nan second to nary astatine each successful 1957—had themselves been forcefully abandoned earlier nan Combined Asian-American Resources Project recovered them successful nan 1970s and built astir them a canon. That some texts are now truthful venerated, however, does not mean they do nary harm.

Teaching either of these Asian American classics subjects students to intensely misogynistic imaginations astir nan alternately vile and angelic, domineering and servile qualities of women, accompanied by scenes of artillery aliases intersexual assault. To thatch these fixtures of Asian American lit is frankincense to explicate their governmental projects—a claiming of America that was an imperative then, if awkwardly nationalistic and settler colonialist now—while helping students besides to clasp nan texts accountable. It is to navigate nan ways nan authors’ understandings of justness and organization autumn short, while besides seeing them arsenic portion of a shared effort to envision a much conscionable future.

The early that Blu’s Hanging envisions is not scaled to macro movements of history, aliases to nan forms of guidance that usually fresh taste studies criteria for governmental rigor. Instead, it dwells successful a world wherever not each villainy is done by group conveniently ensconced successful power. Indeed, immoderate critics recovered Yamanaka’s depiction of nan Ogatas arsenic mediocre to beryllium disingenuous because unrepresentative: Seeing arsenic really only 3.8% of Japanese families successful Hawai’i unrecorded successful poverty, nan suffering of a family for illustration this, they implied, is statistically insignificant. But whitethorn that ne'er beryllium really lit works.

May we spot this time, if we had not seen before, really ruthlessly nan Ogata siblings are ostracized: their poorness made individual and pathologizing precisely because they are outliers successful an able organization which Yamanaka indicts arsenic her own. May we spot nan fullness pinch which difficult things are rendered—so that what is done to one boy important only to 2 insignificant girls is made to matter—for nan costly activity specified penning is. May we find nan communal origin successful this feminist matter moreover if it does its title activity obliquely—at slightest arsenic overmuch arsenic we person recovered successful its literate forefathers, though they service their misogyny consecutive up.

With this rerelease, whitethorn Blu’s Hanging be received into canon—where that is not a postulation of cleanable works, but a literate contented indexing nan improvement of Asian American creation and scholarship, marked by holding ourselves to greater empathies and higher standards each nan time. Reading by nan ray of Yamanaka’s work, fto this caller of unspeakable beauty beryllium an entity instruction successful really to show what is worthy saving.

__________________________

Blu’s Hanging, by Lois-Ann Yamanaka, is disposable now from Kaya Press.