Congress Can Stop California's Radical Environmental Mandates That Hurt The Entire Nation

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has launched an inspiring effort to regain sanity successful our nation’s power policies. One of his initiatives is peculiarly important — reversing nan Biden administration’s effort to supercharge California’s electric-vehicle mandates, which would let that authorities to push a extremist translator of our nation’s fleet from gas-powered to electric. Congress has an opportunity for a argumentation and law triumph here. The reversal of Biden and California’s undemocratic effort is now connected nan five-yard line. To score, Congress needs to punch done 1 much bureaucratic agency.   

Over nan past respective years, California has tried to aggressively export its progressive power ideology, starring to a wide number of short-sighted and unconstitutional policies. Near nan apical of nan database are California’s bureaucratically crafted electric-vehicle mandates, immoderate of which activity to toggle shape nan nation’s heavy-duty fleet from diesel-based to electric.  

California’s effort to thrust nationalist argumentation would usually tally into some law (interstate commerce clause) and statutory (Clean Air Act) roadblocks. Unfortunately, nan Biden Environmental Protection Agency attempted to bless California’s overreach by granting alleged Clean Air Act "preemption waivers" to three electric-vehicle mandates passed by unelected California bureaucrats.  

TRUMP ADMIN TOUTS ENERGY COMEBACK

These waivers springiness California a Sword of Damocles to bent complete nan industry. Nebraska has fought back, starring a three-part conflict by filing lawsuits against California, nan Biden-era mandates and nan trucking companies that agreed to destruct user prime successful nan trucking market. 

EPA main Lee Zeldin is already going aft California's power waivers. It's a bully start. (Getty Images)

The bully news is that nan Trump management is pushing common-sense power policies, and Zeldin has taken nan first basal measurement to repeal nan waivers. Under nan Congressional Review Act, Congress tin repeal EPA’s waivers by passing a solution of disapproval done elemental majorities successful nan House and Senate positive nan president’s signature.  

President Donald Trump’s committedness to unleash American power by rescinding extremist electric-vehicle mandates — mixed pinch Republican majorities successful some houses of Congress — make a legislative repeal a no-brainer. Nebraskans are grateful that our 2 United States Senators, Deb Fischer and Pete Ricketts, are helping to lead nan complaint for power argumentation sanity. 

Now there’s a roadblock. A nonbinding sentiment from nan Government Accountability Office judged that nan California waivers are not "rules" of "general applicability" taxable to reappraisal nether nan Congressional Review Act. That sentiment is wrong.  

The California waivers are "rules" because they enact forward-looking argumentation decisions. And nan waivers are "generally applicable" because they scope good beyond California’s borders. Even if 1 ignores nan evident nationwide (if not worldwide) implications of mandating electrical vehicles successful nan fifth-largest system successful nan world, nan California waivers are mostly applicable because they let different states to enact electric-vehicle mandates they different could not. 

Under nan Clean Air Act, only Congress tin group emanation standards for caller centrifugal vehicles. The sole objection is California, which tin activity a waiver from EPA to enforce emanation standards much stringent than nan national ones. But erstwhile California gets a waiver, immoderate of nan different 49 states tin "adopt and enforce" emanation standards "identical to nan California standards for which a waiver has been granted" without asking EPA for permission.  

So far, 18 states person adopted astatine slightest 1 of California’s electric-vehicle mandates. The Biden-era waiver paves nan measurement for a wide take of California’s bans connected internal-combustion engines. This is precisely nan benignant of agency action that falls wrong nan purview of nan Congressional Review Act.  

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Finding that nan waivers are taxable to nan CRA is some a lawful and commonsense workout of legislature authority. The GAO — headed by an Obama appointee — collapsed its ain precedent successful issuing nonbinding "observations" connected whether nan California waivers are taxable to nan CRA. Never earlier had nan GAO opined connected an agency action that an agency already submitted for CRA review.  

The GAO itself has said that, erstwhile an agency action has been submitted to Congress for CRA review, location are "no impediments to Congress’s workout of those powers that could beryllium cured by an sentiment from GAO." Procedural irregularities aside, nan GAO’s sentiment is substantively flawed. It fails to mention that erstwhile California gets a waiver, each different authorities tin adopt emanation standards identical to nan California standards, giving nan waivers nationwide effect. 

The California waivers are "rules" because they enact forward-looking argumentation decisions. And nan waivers are "generally applicable" because they scope good beyond California’s borders. 

Accepting nan GAO’s caller observations present would efficaciously springiness unelected bureaucrats nan last opportunity connected whether elected lawmakers get to reappraisal sweeping regulatory decisions — decisions that effect nan nationalist economy, user prime and federalism itself. If Congress defers here, it risks outsourcing antiauthoritarian oversight of awesome nationalist argumentation to method advisors. That would weaken our law protections. 

The Republican Party has claimed unified power of nan national authorities only 5 times successful nan past 100 years. Using that power to repeal California’s waivers is some a argumentation and law win. Elected representatives successful Congress, not unelected bureaucrats successful Sacramento aliases a alleged "independent" agency for illustration GAO, person nan powerfulness to modulate nan intends of interstate commerce.  

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Deferring to nan GAO would beryllium an undemocratic trifecta — it would time off successful spot rules written by unelected authorities regulators, approved by unelected national bureaucrats and shielded from antiauthoritarian reappraisal done unelected, self-declared referees. That’s not really a typical authorities is expected to work.  

Repealing nan waivers would do much than artifact a extremist ambiance schedule — it would reconstruct a basal rule of American self-government: that laws pinch nationalist scope must beryllium taxable to nationalist debate, nationalist scrutiny, and nationalist consent. Congress has nan authority to act, and I impulse it to usage that authority and repeal these short-sighted waivers.